Posts by ritterm
| log in |
|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work is not being validated
(Message 1276)
Posted 473 days ago by ritterm @Ananas: You asked... Where does stdout of that result hide? On the WU results page, click on the Task for stderr output and other details. For the result that Cori mentions, click 734237. Is that what you're looking for? |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work is not being validated
(Message 1251)
Posted 474 days ago by ritterm There's been some movement with the validator: 3 of my WU's have validated since my previous post and the server status page now shows zero WU's waiting for validation (which is down from as many as 200 earlier today). All of my pending WU's are waiting for wingmen to report. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
thread for webpage issues
(Message 1247)
Posted 474 days ago by ritterm The "Pending credit" link on the "Your account" page doesn't appear to be working. The links for Tasks -> Pending seem to be fine, though. |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work is not being validated
(Message 1246)
Posted 474 days ago by ritterm I've noticed the same thing and have one pending that my wingman and I have been waiting for over six hours to validate. |
|
5)
Message boards :
News :
Started some new searches, and a status update
(Message 1078)
Posted 508 days ago by ritterm I just want to be sure it isn't so good by like 10x or 100x... Based on what I get elsewhere on my 1090t and C2Q, you are definitely below the low end of that range... Shooting for maybe 5x-7.5x... ...but you might be a little short of that one. I estimate you are somewhere around 4x. ...because of the downtime issues and me still debugging a lot of things. Since a bunch of workunits may fail, I'd like to make up for this with the workunits that do work. I think we all appreciate that consideration...and for that, we thank you. Keep up the good work. |
|
6)
Message boards :
News :
Started some new searches, and a status update
(Message 1075)
Posted 508 days ago by ritterm Credit is somewhere between AWESOME and OMFG ;) For an established, production CPU project that isn't overly demanding of a host's resources (RAM, run-time, etc.), the values I've gotten are far above average on a 'stone/hour basis. But, if you're still "testing" and there are errors, maybe not so much. Regardless, I'm not going to complain...but send us more! :D |
|
7)
Message boards :
News :
Started some new searches, and a status update
(Message 1068)
Posted 508 days ago by ritterm I've finished two mtub_3's without any problems. This one on a 1090t, 336494, and this one, 336485 on a C2Q. Both machines are Win7 hosts. Credit is excellent. |
|
8)
Message boards :
News :
more workunits and an update
(Message 949)
Posted 601 days ago by ritterm Hi, I just joined on 26 October and cannot get any WUs...I hope I can process some WUs, soon. Be patient... :-) This is a relatively new project and, as yet, doesn't have steady work. Keep fishing and you'll get a few here and there! Happy crunching! MarkR |
|
9)
Message boards :
News :
more workunits and an update
(Message 941)
Posted 606 days ago by ritterm Great news! +1 ...basically workunits will be available to everyone who wants one as long... As long as...what? ;-) |
|
10)
Message boards :
News :
We're not dead! I promise!
(Message 863)
Posted 702 days ago by ritterm Congratulations, Professor! Well done and good luck in the new postition! Looking forward to the new work here. |